Electronic Human Resource Management and Employee Efficiency: Test of the Mediating Role of Impersonal Trust
This study investigates the relationships between electronic human resource management (e-HRM) and employee efficiency in private companies, with impersonal trust being the intervening variable. A conceptual model was developed and tested using data collected from 167 HR professionals for the study. Data set was examined, and hypotheses were tested by employing Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) analysis. The result reveal that all hypothesis supported, as well as impersonal trust mediates (partially) the relationship between e-HRM and employee efficiency. The results show that technology-enabled HRM supports organisations by enhancing organisational trust and efficiency outcomes. The key predictors for improving employee efficiency are organisational trust and e-HRM. e-HRM, in the HRM department has a positive impact on employees’ trust. The outcomes show the valuable insights for HR professionals allowing them to enhance employee efficiency by applying e-HRM to upgrade employees’ trust in the company.
Ashbaugh, S., and Miranda, R. (2002). Technology for human resources management: Seven questions and answers. Public Personnel Management, 31(1), 7-20.
Bamberger, P. A., Biron, M., and Meshoulam, I. (2014). Human resource strategy: Formulation, implementation, and impact: Routledge.
Becker, B. E., and Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: where do we go from here? Journal of management, 32(6), 898-925.
Bissola, R., and Imperatori, B. (2014). The unexpected side of relational e-HRM: Developing trust in the HR department. Employee Relations, 36(4), 376-397.
Bondarouk, T., Ruël, H., and van der Heijden, B. (2009). e-HRM effectiveness in a public sector organization: a multi-stakeholder perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 578-590.
Boselie, P., Dietz, G., and Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human resource management journal, 15(3), 67-94.
Bratton, J., and Gold, J. (2017). Human resource management: theory and practice: Palgrave.
Browning, V., Edgar, F., Gray, B., and Garrett, T. (2009). Realising competitive advantage through HRM in New Zealand service industries. The Service Industries Journal, 29(6), 741-760.
Chen, C.-J., and Huang, J.-W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of business research, 62(1), 104-114.
Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690): Springer.
Chin, W. W., and Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical strategies for small sample research, 1(1), 307-341.
Cho, Y. J., and Park, H. (2011). Exploring the relationships among trust, employee satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Public Management Review, 13(4), 551-573.
Cropanzano, R., and Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
Culnan, M. J., and Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization science, 10(1), 104-115.
Dery, K., Grant, D., and Wiblen, S. (2009). Human resource information systems (HRIS): Replacing or enhancing HRM. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association IIRA, 24-27.
Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., and Puumalainen, K. (2008). The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 160-181.
Fulmer, C. A., and Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167-1230.
Gardner, S. D., Lepak, D. P., and Bartol, K. M. (2003). Virtual HR: The impact of information technology on the human resource professional. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 159-179.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., and Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., and Menictas, C. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115-142.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., and Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.
Hulland, J. S. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal 20 (2),195–204.
Hussain, Z., Wallace, J., and Cornelius, N. E. (2007). The use and impact of human resource information systems on human resource management professionals. information & Management, 44(1), 74-89.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1-10.
Lewicka, D., and Krot, K. (2015). The model of HRM-trust-commitment relationships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(8), 1457-1480.
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., and Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
Marler, J. H., and Fisher, S. L. (2013). An evidence-based review of e-HRM and strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 18-36.
Martins, N., and Van der Berg, Y. (2013). The relationship between organisational trust and quality of work life. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1-13.
McEvily, B., and Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23-63.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization science, 11(4), 404-428.
Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and performance: Achieving long-term viability: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Parry, E. (2011). An examination of e-HRM as a means to increase the value of the HR function. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(05), 1146-1162.
Parry, E., and Tyson, S. (2011). Desired goals and actual outcomes of e?HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 335-354.
Patel, P. C., and Conklin, B. (2012). Perceived Labor Productivity in Small Firms—The Effects of High–Performance Work Systems and Group Culture through Employee Retention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 205-235.
Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 885(879), 10.1037.
Ruel, H. J., Bondarouk, T. V., and Van der Velde, M. (2007). The contribution of e-HRM to HRM effectiveness: Results from a quantitative study in a Dutch Ministry. Employee relations, 29(3), 280-291.
Searle, R., Den Hartog, D. N., Weibel, A., Gillespie, N., Six, F., Hatzakis, T., et al. (2011). Trust in the employer: The role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(05), 1069-1092.
Shahreki, J., and Nakanishi, H. (2016). The Relationship between Task Technology Fit and Individual Performance: Case Study in Hotel Industry in Malaysia. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Support Systems, 3(6), 1-15.
Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623-658.
Stone, D. L., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., and Johnson, R. (2015). The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 216-231.
Strohmeier, S. (2007). Research in e-HRM: Review and implications. Human resource management review, 17(1), 19-37.
Strohmeier, S. (2009). Concepts of e-HRM consequences: a categorisation, review and suggestion. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 528-543.
Tansley, C., Newell, S., and Williams, H. (2001). Effecting HRM-style practices through an integrated human resource information system: An e-greenfield site? Personnel Review, 30(3), 351-371.
Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.
Tzafrir, S. S. (2005). The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9), 1600-1622.
Vanhala, M., and Ahteela, R. (2011). The effect of HRM practices on impersonal organizational trust. Management Research Review, 34(8), 869-888.
Vanhala, M., and Ritala, P. (2016). HRM practices, impersonal trust and organizational innovativeness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 95-109.
Voermans, M., and van Veldhoven, M. (2007). Attitude towards E-HRM: an empirical study at Philips. Personnel Review, 36(6), 887-902.
Wiblen, S. (2016). Framing the usefulness of eHRM in talent management: A case study of talent identification in a professional services firm. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 33(2), 95-107.
Yusliza, M., Ramayah, T., and Haslindar, I. (2011). HR roles and E-HRM: Some initial evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Current Research, 3(2), 131-138.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2014 Penerbit UTM Press. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. All rights reserved.
Mailing Address: Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.